Protects the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts.
Law Section: Labor Law
Law: Add S215-d, Lab L
Co-sponsor(s): KRUEGERCommittee: LABOR
Law Section: Labor Law
Law: Add S215-d, Lab L
- May 31, 2012: PRINT NUMBER 7077A
- May 31, 2012: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LABOR
- Apr 27, 2012: REFERRED TO LABOR
BILL NUMBER:S7077 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to protecting the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts PURPOSE: To protect the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: The labor law is amended by adding a new section 2l5-d which prohibits invasion of privacy by an employer against an employee or prospective employee in regard to using an electronic communications device. The section states that employers shall not require any employee or appli- cant to disclose any log-in name, password or other means for accessing a personal account or service through an electronic communications device. Employers cannot terminate, discipline or penalize an employee for refusing to disclose this information. JUSTIFICATION: With the increase of technology and social media presence in our every- day lives, states are taking action to protect employees and employers from any invasion of privacy regarding social media accounts. This bill would prohibit employers from requesting user names and/or passwords from their employees to social media venues such as Facebook and Twit- ter, and protect both parties from an invasion of privacy. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Maryland was the first state to adopt password protection legislation. As this becomes a preva- lent issue, legislation to restrict employer access to social media user names and passwords has been introduced in at least eight other states, including: California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, South Carolina, and Washington. New York State must also take action to protect employees and employers from privacy invasion in regard to social media. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New legislation. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 7077 I N SENATE April 27, 2012 ___________ Introduced by Sens. GRISANTI, KRUEGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to protecting the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 215-d to read as follows:
S 215-D. INVASION OF PRIVACY BY AN EMPLOYER AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OR PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE. 1. DEFINITIONS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
(A) "APPLICANT" MEANS AN APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT. (B) "ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE" MEANS ANY DEVICE THAT USES ELECTRONIC SIGNALS TO CREATE, TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE INFORMATION, AND SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, COMPUTERS, TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES. 2. (A) AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIG- NEE SHALL NOT REQUIRE ANY EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT TO DISCLOSE ANY LOG-IN NAME, PASSWORD OR OTHER MEANS FOR ACCESSING A PERSONAL ACCOUNT OR SERVICE THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE. (B) AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIGNEE MAY REQUIRE AN EMPLOYEE TO DISCLOSE ANY LOG-IN NAME, PASSWORD OR OTHER MEANS FOR ACCESSING NON-PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OR SERVICES THAT PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE EMPLOYER'S INTERNAL COMPUTER OR INFORMATION SYSTEMS. 3. AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIGNEE SHALL NOT:
(A) TERMINATE, DISCIPLINE OR OTHERWISE PENALIZE AN EMPLOYEE, OR THREATEN TO TERMINATE, DISCIPLINE OR OTHERWISE PENALIZE AN EMPLOYEE FOR THE EMPLOYEE'S REFUSAL TO DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION; OR (B) FAIL OR REFUSE TO HIRE ANY APPLICANT AS A RESULT OF THE APPLI- CANT'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION. 4. (A) WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY APPLY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD15421-01-2 S. 7077 2 NEW YORK FOR AN ORDER ENJOINING OR RESTRAINING THE COMMISSION OR CONTIN- UANCE OF THE ALLEGED UNLAWFUL ACTS. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING, THE COURT MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR THE FIRST VIOLATION AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION. (B) IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER PENALTIES OR ACTIONS OTHERWISE APPLICABLE PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER, WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, AN AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUAL MAY COMMENCE AN ACTION FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND DAMAGES. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.