Protects the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts.
Sponsor: GRISANTI
Law Section: Labor Law
Law: Add S215-d, Lab L
Co-sponsor(s):
KRUEGER
Committee: LABOR
Law Section: Labor Law
Law: Add S215-d, Lab L
S7077-2011 Actions
- May 31, 2012: PRINT NUMBER 7077A
- May 31, 2012: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LABOR
- Apr 27, 2012: REFERRED TO LABOR
S7077-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S7077 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to protecting the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts PURPOSE: To protect the privacy of employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: The labor law is amended by adding a new section 2l5-d which prohibits invasion of privacy by an employer against an employee or prospective employee in regard to using an electronic communications device. The section states that employers shall not require any employee or appli- cant to disclose any log-in name, password or other means for accessing a personal account or service through an electronic communications device. Employers cannot terminate, discipline or penalize an employee for refusing to disclose this information. JUSTIFICATION: With the increase of technology and social media presence in our every- day lives, states are taking action to protect employees and employers from any invasion of privacy regarding social media accounts. This bill would prohibit employers from requesting user names and/or passwords from their employees to social media venues such as Facebook and Twit- ter, and protect both parties from an invasion of privacy. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Maryland was the first state to adopt password protection legislation. As this becomes a preva- lent issue, legislation to restrict employer access to social media user names and passwords has been introduced in at least eight other states, including: California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, South Carolina, and Washington. New York State must also take action to protect employees and employers from privacy invasion in regard to social media. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New legislation. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
S7077-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
7077
I N SENATE
April 27, 2012
___________
Introduced by Sens. GRISANTI, KRUEGER -- read twice and ordered printed,
and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor
AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to protecting the privacy of
employees' and prospective employees' social media accounts
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 215-d to
read as follows:
S 215-D. INVASION OF PRIVACY BY AN EMPLOYER AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OR
PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE. 1. DEFINITIONS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
(A) "APPLICANT" MEANS AN APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT.
(B) "ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE" MEANS ANY DEVICE THAT USES
ELECTRONIC SIGNALS TO CREATE, TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE INFORMATION, AND
SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, COMPUTERS, TELEPHONES, PERSONAL
DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES.
2. (A) AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIG-
NEE SHALL NOT REQUIRE ANY EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT TO DISCLOSE ANY LOG-IN
NAME, PASSWORD OR OTHER MEANS FOR ACCESSING A PERSONAL ACCOUNT OR
SERVICE THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE.
(B) AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIGNEE
MAY REQUIRE AN EMPLOYEE TO DISCLOSE ANY LOG-IN NAME, PASSWORD OR OTHER
MEANS FOR ACCESSING NON-PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OR SERVICES THAT PROVIDE
ACCESS TO THE EMPLOYER'S INTERNAL COMPUTER OR INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
3. AN EMPLOYER, EMPLOYER'S AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR ITS DESIGNEE
SHALL NOT:
(A) TERMINATE, DISCIPLINE OR OTHERWISE PENALIZE AN EMPLOYEE, OR
THREATEN TO TERMINATE, DISCIPLINE OR OTHERWISE PENALIZE AN EMPLOYEE FOR
THE EMPLOYEE'S REFUSAL TO DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF
SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION; OR
(B) FAIL OR REFUSE TO HIRE ANY APPLICANT AS A RESULT OF THE APPLI-
CANT'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION
TWO OF THIS SECTION.
4. (A) WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED,
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY APPLY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15421-01-2
S. 7077 2
NEW YORK FOR AN ORDER ENJOINING OR RESTRAINING THE COMMISSION OR CONTIN-
UANCE OF THE ALLEGED UNLAWFUL ACTS. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING, THE COURT
MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR
THE FIRST VIOLATION AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT
VIOLATION.
(B) IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER PENALTIES OR ACTIONS OTHERWISE APPLICABLE
PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER, WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED
TO HAVE OCCURRED, AN AGGRIEVED INDIVIDUAL MAY COMMENCE AN ACTION FOR
EQUITABLE RELIEF AND DAMAGES.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus